|
Wedding Reception Bridal Gown Wedding Dance True Marriage Marriage and Culture (Bridal Days) December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 
RSS 2.0    |
|
|
Marriage and Culture (Bridal Days)
Allow me to state my position on this issue. As a practicing Catholic, I strongly support the Church's position on marriage and the family. The Church's definition of a marriage is: Marriage is a sacred sacrament that permanently joins a man and a woman into one in the eyes of God until death does them part. This means that there is No room for homosexuality nor divorce in the marriage union. Whereas others might try to diminish the value of the marriage sacrament, by arguing that those people of the same sex who love each other and live together ought to be allowed to marry or even have civil unions, effectively qualifying them for the full benefits accorded married couples, I stand by the Church and her teachings. There is no ambiguity in the fact that God intended for men to marry women and when they deviated from his script, they were terminally punished, as vividly documented in the Holy Bible regarding the destruction of Homosexuality is neither natural nor normal; rather it is a lifestyle choice individuals make and a very poor one at that. Just like people choose to get disfigured with tattoos, they also choose to indulge in homosexuality. They should not force themselves upon the majority of the society, nor manipulate the law to accommodate them for their immoral lifestyle choices. While I would like to think this is the end of this discussion, some ******* or **** somewhere is boiling inside out at my remarks and would like to comment on this issue; well, their comments are not welcome on this blog and that’s the end of it. I’m sure there are several God fearing Christians out there who share my moral convictions and would like to add a word or two to this blog before we discuss the various weddings we have attended, helped to organize, or participated in. We will also touch on the most memorable and bizarre weddings too. More definition of a marriage can be found on the website below: http://www.springweddingconcepts.com
53 comments from 21 users
posted by
ProgressoDasani
on Oct 2, 2008 at 04:42 PM
People sure do enjoy bashing Brittany on this topic. Strictly speaking, it is highly likely that her 50-hour marriage was invalid anyway - conceived and consumated as it probably was, in a drunken rush without its sacramental nature properly understood by at least one partner. One could probably apply that to most marriages in this modern age. But never mind. Divorce does cheapen marrige, of course. Until very recently it has been generally discouraged, including with legal sanctions, precisely to prevent that cheapening. Anyway, you would not apply a similar rationalization if a loved one sick with the measles, then developed pnemonia. You would just properly see the pnemonia as more bad news, and you would want it cured.
posted by
morningland
on Oct 2, 2008 at 04:25 PM
I think your definition of marriage is fine for you, but please don't try to force it on me. If your church believes that way, fine, but don't force your church's teachings on me either. I believe in love (you know, like Jesus wanted us to), and I believe that love should be celebrated by anyone who finds it. I believe that all people should have access to the same rights to show and celebrate their love as their neighbors do. If there is any judging to be done, I'll leave that to God (like Jesus told us to do; Matthew 7:1). I further believe that Proposition 8, which would narrowly define marriage as between a man and a woman in California, is unconstitutional and un-American. Leaving religion out of the picture -- because religion doesn't/shouldn't dictate equality and justice -- please remember that the United States of America was founded on the principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and justice for all, and equal opportunity for all (should I go on or do you finally remember the part about how we are a free country?). Prop 8 is a proposition that would limit some American's rights to all of the above -- Proposition 8 is trying to be a legal way to discriminate. If you believe that people have the right to live their own lives the way they see fit, you will vote No on 8 and let them live their lives. (If you vote yes on 8, you are saying it is all right to discriminate against some Americans, and that is what feels so un-American to me.) Four brave judges followed the law and did not bow down to the people who want to discriminate against gay people -- it would be good if we all send a message that limiting rights is not the way our country operates, that equality under the law should be upheld. Don't make it legal to discriminate -- vote no on 8 -- and go ahead and live your life the way you want to without trying to make others believe the same things you do. posted by
Colitas
on Dec 8, 2007 at 06:55 AM
Yeah awsome8 I ask the same question about nature but surprisingly no answer. Hmm posted by
awsmom8
on Dec 7, 2007 at 11:30 PM
Are you sure that Callenby is not jim????LOLCallenby-you say homosexuality is not natural or normal--then how do you explain the many documented cases that appear in wildlife and animals? Also you say that this is the churches statement on homosexuality---BUT IT"S NOT GODS STATEMENT!!!! posted by
bunee
on Dec 7, 2007 at 07:56 PM
I don't think his name is "Hitman" by accident. He wants to come off like a bad a**...mission accomplished.
posted by
bunee
on Dec 7, 2007 at 07:50 PM
Is this a joke? You've got to be kidding! I think Callenby needs a thorough psychiatric evaluation!I'd be willing to bet the farm that the Catholic Church would give you the boot for claiming to represent them in your delusional state. I'm positive GOD himself would not appreciate you thinking you could take his place. Especially when you have no idea what the bible says. The bible is not up to your own twisted interpretation. I'd like to mention that I looked at your profile, and there is NO information. You like to spout off your hateful and judge mental opinions, but won't identify yourself. That's right, it's ONLY YOUR opinion, and I don't even know who you are. Look at yourself and then tell us who you are and what you hope to accomplish with your hurtful words. posted by
GOD
on Dec 7, 2007 at 02:03 PM
Love one another as I have loved you posted by
Colitas
on Dec 7, 2007 at 10:54 AM
Ok Hitman....in reference to the "little group" or us who have "banded together", we are not the "majority on here". If you look back on this thread, it is 10 to 6 in favor of people who believe in some sort of a higher power. So in my calculations that is a majority on your side "faith". As far as people attacking, yes they did. When Callenby posted his blog and was saying his beliefs it was all good----whether or not some of us believed in them. But then he became hateful and ignorant by "attacking" people with words such as "faggot and dykes". So yes, people didn't want to here rest of what he had to say because of the hatred. He sabotaged himself. As far as you go, you have thrown many stones yourself and stop whining. You jumped in here swinging, so when people swing back you start crying wolf. Yes everyone has their opinion, so stop crying. BTW, if you have noticed, many of us on here disagree with one another constantly, but for some reason we are able to find common ground and not whine about it. Hmm, I wonder why that is? Oh, I know it's because we have no religion.
posted by
bigdog
on Dec 7, 2007 at 09:59 AM
Hitman you must have low self esteem because you make every blog about you. you always have a problem with whats being said and you turn every blog into being all about little old you.haha ''littleman''
posted by
bigdog
on Dec 7, 2007 at 09:52 AM
Hit man you must have low self esteem because you sure do like to talk down to people.Tell me when you talk bad about someone does that make you feel better about your self. I would think that you being a man of Religion, faith and with far more morality then us pagans you wouldn't need to be so hateful, unless your being hateful in the name of god because then its OK. posted by
bigdog
on Dec 7, 2007 at 09:06 AM
Hitman i should not lower myself to your level but i will. Hitman do you have bad dreams.Do people chase you in your dreams because you come across as an Paranoid Schizoid. You accuse ''Everyone'' on this site of attacking and shoving their beliefs down your throat When all a long all they are doing is posting their comments, nothing more. Hitman do i fall in the group of people that has no religion, faith and morality. Yes it is true that i do not got religion.You can keep it i don't want it.I have a lot of faith in a power greater then me and when it comes to morality i think I'll let god judge me on that, that's his job.And if i say that people of faith are hateful then it is because they are acting hateful. Why do people of faith get to judge everyone Else?Let man without sin cast the first stone. Hitman drop the rock.IMHO people that get offended while blogging should not be blogging. Joty you are not the one that needs meds posted by
Joty
on Dec 7, 2007 at 08:47 AM
He can't oohchild, that's the problem. He's not too bright and wound way too tight. Express an opinion or challenge - he cries "attack", but then he responds in kind. I wonder why he edited his second thread... No matter, I'm done with him. It's not fair to engage in a battle of wits with someone so obviously unarmed. hey bigdog, I took my meds, honest!!!!! posted by
oohchild
on Dec 7, 2007 at 08:28 AM
hitman, you are perfectly welcome to your opinions. But when you make a statement that implys those without religion have no morals, you're going to get piled on. Morals do not require a religion or faith. Some of the most moral people I know happen to be either atheist or agnostic. Morals are relative, not absolute. I'll leave it at that, unless you'd like to explore the issue further. posted by
olivia
on Dec 7, 2007 at 04:51 AM
LOL, Jim Thank you.
posted by
jimr
on Dec 7, 2007 at 04:29 AM
Callenby needs to do some scientific research before spouting all this misguided rhetoric. He/she needs to read the current position white papers from the American Psychology Association and the American Psychiatric Association wherein they state that homosexuality is NOT a choice that people make but rather inherited in the genes when a baby is born. No one CHOOSES to be homosexual. It's a tough life being ostracized and discriminated against and suffering all the real life gay bashing as well as having to live two separate lives most of the time. Consider the following:
Laura Schlessinger is a US radio personality who disperses advice to people who call in to her radio show. She stirred up controversy when she aired her remarks that as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned in any circumstances.
The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a US resident which made it's rounds on the internet.... Dear Dr. Laura, Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I just simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to follow them. a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord Leviticus 1:19. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanness Leviticus 15:19-24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. d) Leviticus 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself? f) A friend of mine feels that though eating shellfish is an abomination Leviticus 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? g) Leviticus 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here? h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Leviticus 19:27. How should they die? i) I know from Leviticus 11:68 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Leviticus 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Leviticus 24:10-16 Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? Leviticus 20:14 I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us God's word is eternal and unchanging. Your devoted disciple and adoring fan, & nbsp; &n bsp; &nb sp; Jim Richards
|
