Search:

the way I see it
About TK


Real Name:
teri kahn
Member Since:
October 19, 2006
Last Signed In:
July 21, 2008
Profile Views:
3149
Blog Views:
4448
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
you tube question
MORE ON LOUSY DRIVERS
Cheap Tomatoes
May Karma Smite You
Bureau of Automotive Repair
new place in town
fire equipment
NEW DIRECTORS
The story was flawed
Our Pets in Danger
Archives
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

A badly written bill is going to be heard, again, in State Assembly Committee on Business and Professions.  Assembly Bill 1634 will be reviewed on 24 April.  This bill has the ability to kill dog competitions within the state.  It is written to allow puppy-mills to flourish while forcing the dedicated hobby-breeders to sterilize their animals, effectively ending their bloodlines within the state.  This does nothing to end pet dumping.  The people who use dogs and cats as a way to make money (i/e the backyard breeders and puppy-mills) will simply pay the extra fee and keep going.  It will just be the cost of doing business.  The hobby-breeder, often a retiree, will have to decide whether keeping a couple intact animals for the fun of showing is worth the extra expense.   Hobby-breeders spend more on their animals than they ever make in the occasional litter (one litter every four or five years is about average). 

AB1634 has been amended twice and it still stinks.  Please visit http://home.earthlink.net/~... and check out what you can do tonight.   

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: dogs, cats, dog fanciers, legislation
posted by TK on Monday, April 23, 2007 at 02:23 PM
Permalink - Comments [6] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 190 times
Now Imus is out after making some nasty remarks about college women on a Rutgers basketball team.  He publicly apologized, as he should.  There's another apology I'd like to hear.  The Duke lacrosse players, young college men, were falsely accused of rape, assault, and making racially threatening remarks.  They were reviled nationally by Rev. Al Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson, among others.   Will the goodly reverends be as public in their apologies to these college men?  Will they admit they made a mistake in jumping on the finger-pointing circus without a shred of proof?  In the deafening silence, which I will bet we'll hear on this subject from these men of good faith, I will wonder what has become of the American hopes for a colorblind society.
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by TK on Friday, April 13, 2007 at 01:21 AM
Permalink - Comments [16] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 327 times