|
TVRPD info? This puts a few things into perspective Am I the only one? Evolution OK, what are they doing downtown? Circle of friends What has happened to Sesame Street? August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Am I the only one?
This has been so frustrating to me, I don't even know HOW to handle it. My daughter is a third grader at one of the elementary schools here in town. I know she's enthusiastic about learning and I know she's smart, but the work just seems to be getting the better of her. Last year she had nearly all As the entire year. This year, though I know her teacher is a little more strict and the workload is heavier, she's getting just mediocre grades. She's in title one, in before school tutoring, and I help here at home whenever she doesn't understand something, and yet she's still having so many problems keeping up with how fast new things are being introduced and remembering all these new ideas. What this seems to come down to, from my point of view, is the curriculum. Her teacher told us at the beginning of the year that the third grade curriculum (and probably many other grade's curriculums) is for the most part created to get STAR test scores up. Am I the only one that thinks there's something wrong with this? It bothers me to think that my daughter is being molded to be a test score. I have seen an incredible lack of anything creative coming out of her class, which honestly disturbs me. And when my child comes home from school as stressed out about her schoolwork as I am about my own work, it makes me sick to my stomach. She's 8 years old! She should be enjoying herself and having the opportunity to be a kid, not having to think about doing well on a state-mandated test! What has happened to our school system? Do they not realize high test scores do not mean better students? Do they not know that a bad test score doesn't mean a child isn't smart? It's appalling the state and district can weigh so much on these scores.
3 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
dhall
on Dec 22, 2006 at 08:42 AM
I think teaching kids just to pass a test is the wrong way to go about educating. That is like us, as adults going to work just to get a paycheck. Granted that is what most of us end up doing. Ideally there should be a love of or a passion for what we do in life. I know we don't live in an ideal world, but shouldn't we strive for that for our children. I am appalled at the amount of homework my 1st grader gets. My husband and I have to fight with her daily to get her to do it. The homework isn't hard, she knows how to do it, but there is just so much of it. I wonder how much she will be bringing home once she gets to Junior High or High School. posted by
gillfish
on Dec 22, 2006 at 12:39 PM
posted by
Sparks
on Dec 22, 2006 at 04:24 PM
Ah, I see. Sadly I do not have any children so I know very little about the school system. SO, I did some research. it's seems many approve of this testing. Mostly Republicans, but some Democrats as well. Thus I do not see an end to this anytime soon. Indeed it is a very complex issue. WHEW!!! I read many articles of people complaining of their elementary school children doing 2 hours of homework every day. The stress is unbearable for some.. I researched the reason for excessive homework.....This is what I got so far. Gov. Pete Wilson decided it was important to test students immediately, with a test that would show how each student compared to national and state averages. New educational programs, such as class-size reduction, new reading methods, and the increased use of technology in the classroom, make it "vital to be able to assess how these things are working," says Kalustian. So during the 1997 state-budget negotiations, Wilson held out for a bill authorizing a new basic-skills exam for all second- through 11th-graders in California public schools. The state Board of Education chose STAR. Congress adopts Bush’s plan for even more testing The spring testing season produced widespread resistance by test-weary students, parents, and teachers even as President George W. Bush’s education plan, which requires doubling or tripling the required number of tests students take in many states, sailed through the U.S. House of Representatives with support on both sides of the aisle. Two Congresspeople from states where resistance to high-stakes testing has been the strongest, Rep. Peter Hoeskstra (R-MI) and Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), offered an amendment to strike Bush’s testing plan from HR 1, a bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and which included much of Bush’s education agenda, excepting federally funded vouchers for students to attend private schools. The Hoeskstra/Frank amendment was handily defeated and the House voted 384-45 for HR 1, including the cornerstone of Bush’s education plan, which requires states to test students in third through eighth grade every year in reading and math. According to the plan, schools whose students fall short of testing norms would at first receive extra funding and assistance. But if a school’s test scores continued to lag, it would be forced to take “corrective action,” such as replacing its entire staff or closing and reopening as a charter school. In addition, students at schools without adequate test scores would be able to transfer to other public schools. They could also use federal funds for private tutoring, through public or private religious organizations. The Senate bill, S 1, which would reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, calls for a “system of high-quality, yearly student assessments,” but does not specify that tests be comparable across districts or grades within a state. Despite the fact that U.S. students are already tested at an unprecedented level, support of the massive testing program remains strong in Congress. Sen. Paul Wellstone, however, has reintroduced the Fairness and Accuracy in Student Testing Act, a bill that stipulates that for any state or local educational agency receiving federal money, a single standardized test “shall not be the sole determinant…of any decision about the retention, graduation, tracking, or within-class grouping of an individual student.” It's a catch 22 for schools and their staff.
1
|