Search:

The Weedpatch Gazette

A blog about Personal Journals.
About samheath


Real Name:
Samuel Heath
Member Since:
February 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
October 11, 2008
Profile Views:
4738
Blog Views:
53948
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
Archives
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
samheath - > The Weedpatch Gazette -> The Killer Kern!
The Killer Kern!

If you were swimming and fishing in the Kern River back in the 40s you might have heard someone say, “The Kern River mile for mile is the most dangerous river in the world for loss of lives.” Even as a kid I thought this farfetched, something fabulous or extravagant some of the grownups would say as a warning like; “Be careful with that BB gun; you can put your eye out.” And while I never actually knew a kid that had stuck the barrel of his BB gun up to his eye and pulled the trigger, such things actually happened through carelessness on some rare occasions; which only proved to me as a boy that occasionally some kids could be as stupid as some adults.

However, when I saw the very first warning sign about the Kern River posted at the mouth of the canyon years ago my first reaction was resentment. I resented some nanny government functionary stating the patently obvious fact that you could actually drown in the river! Hey! Here were the “grownups” telling me once more I could put my eye out with my BB gun! But really, I thought at the time, have people actually become so stupid they don’t know a plunge into boulder-strewn, white water rapids is a dangerous thing to do?

Over the years we have become accustomed, in many cases callous to the many ways government attempts to control our lives to the extent we now live in an America where anyone can be sued for any reason, an America where lawyers and judges rule our lives and in which Big Brother will step in and tell us “what is best for our own good,” but in the end no one from the President on down is expected to accept personal responsibility for anything.

We need warning labels in many instances, and that skull and crossbones logo on some medicines I recall from childhood, and still used today, were necessary. And kids need all the adult supervision possible at all times. As a child I needed someone to point out what that skull and crossbones on a label meant. But a child can, and too often does, drown in a pail of water because of the lack of adult supervision. Adults need caution labels on buckets warning them this can happen? There needs to be caution labels on bathtubs warning children can drown in them?

Perhaps the warning signs about the Kern River are a good thing. But when I was teaching shop classes, during safety instruction I would tell my pupils “You can make a machine foolproof; but you cannot make it fool proof.” Over the years I collected an archive of stories about fools that make the point.

From childhood I have been engaged in “risk behavior;” guns, motorcycles, fast cars and airplanes; all of which do not suffer fools, and will certainly kill fools. When I started flying in the 50s a fellow had a J3-Cub at the Torrance airport with “armstrong starter.” I didn’t need my buddy to tell me that prop could kill you if you didn’t watch yourself. There was no warning label on that prop and there is a very good reason the guy in the plane shouts “Contact!” when he is ready for you to pull that prop through to start the engine. What I didn’t expect was when we took off he decided to teach me how to put the bird in an intentional spin so I could learn how to recover. This is no longer allowed because of the danger of such a maneuver. I recall the placard prominently displayed on a WWII AT-6 at Minter Field that read: Do Not Put This Aircraft In An Intentional Spin!

So, there is a proper time and place for warning signs and labels. Perhaps the Kern River needs such signs. But the resentment remains that there are such people Big Brother needs to care for because they are fools. My resentment stems from there seeming to be no want of fools that need to be told they can actually drown in the Kern River. Worse; the less personal responsibility and personal accountability we see in our government the more the fools seem to outnumber those with just plain common sense. And the signs and labels just keep multiplying, but they will never prevent anyone from being a damned fool, they will never make the “Killer Kern” fool proof.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by samheath on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 at 07:34 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 310 times
17 comments from 7 users

1 2

posted by Active4People on Jun 28, 2007 at 08:29 AM
Sam, labels/warnings are appropriate when there are obviously hidden dangers, and hidden dangers do not presuppose someone necessarily a fool if they are entangled in them. If someone is obviously aware of hidden danger, be it the government, you, me, or anyone else, and we see someone doing something that is going to cross paths with that danger, we probably have a moral obligation to interject. I don't believe daredevils who are "obviously aware" are included in this obligation. The signs are intended for the rationale decision making person (who may be unaware of danger), so I can't agree I would resent them as a general statement. As regards the Kern River, yes, it needs signs because there are lots of places with hidden dangers which are not present in all rivers (some rivers and places in rivers are great for swimming safely).
posted by samheath on Jun 28, 2007 at 08:38 AM
Think what you will, and I will do the same.
posted by countygirl on Jun 28, 2007 at 10:46 AM
In a world where people are sue happy and constantly trying to place blame on something or someone else warning signs are a must in order for companies, agencies, etc. to cover their " you know what"! Just take the drowning of a little girl last year at The Park at River Walk in Bakersfield. The family is now suing because there were no signs posted!!
posted by samheath on Jun 28, 2007 at 11:00 AM
All too true countygirl. I recall a far more responsible generation where we were not surrounded by salivating lawyers ready to sue for millions over a pair of pants or their own negligence as parents.
posted by countygirl on Jun 28, 2007 at 11:35 AM
The perfect example of this is the father of Josh Hancock, pitcher for the St. Louis Cardinals, who passed away in a drunk driving accident  this April. Hancock's blood alcohol level was nearly twice the legal limit when he ran his car into the back of a tow truck. He was speeding, talking on his cell, and not wearing his seat belt. His father is now going after the restaurant that was serving him, the tow truck company, and the driver of the car that was getting towed. Pretty sad, eh.
posted by samheath on Jun 28, 2007 at 11:52 AM
It seems to be a sickness pervading an increasingly sick society where no one is expected to be accountable for their own negligence.
posted by GregL on Jun 28, 2007 at 11:55 AM
I couldn't agree more, Sam and countygirl!  When did people stop taking personal responsibility for their actions?  Long ago I'm afraid!  Why is it the restaurant's fault that the customer drank too much?  Why doesn't the father sue the cell phone manufacturer and the cell service provider too?  Very sad. 

This issue opens up a whole can of worms with our society.  Excessive litigation, excessive jury awards, the lack of personal responsibility and accountability, the pointing of fingers.  Many times companies and corporations will settle simply to avoid the cost of litigation.  What these people don't understand is that whomever they sue is just going to pass on the cost of litigation to the consumer.  So when someone sues an auto maker because their loved one was killed in a car crash while driving drunk or speeding or whatever, the rest of us end up footing the bill.  The litigant may think they are making the corporation pay, but in reality WE ALL pay!  I would like to ask a litigant in that position, "What did getting a settlement from a business that had no fault in an accident really accomplish, other than making you rich?!"

Those selfish people who think they are "getting back" at big business are basically screwing society as a whole!  Thanks so much!

Wow, this sure got me lit up!  OK, I'm done now...
posted by samheath on Jun 28, 2007 at 12:12 PM
Hey Greg, We the People aren't through so long as we have a voice and make our voices heard.
posted by samheath on Jun 28, 2007 at 02:26 PM
I've had the rare good fortune to have fished all the major rivers in California and over thirty of those throughout the rest of America. These might be thought quite remarkable for the lack of signs that adorn the Kern River. Maybe this says something about the level of personal responsibility elsewhere compared to Kern County.
posted by samheath on Jun 29, 2007 at 05:05 AM
The subject is personal responsibility.
posted by jer72 on Jun 29, 2007 at 11:54 AM

I would have to say that I agree and disagree to parts of the blog. First I agree that personal responsibility is or appears to have gone with the wind. It is like the McDonald's Hot Coffee lawsuit. How was it McDonald's fault that a lady set her cup of coffee between her leg and spill it on herself? She ordered "HOT" coffee! Fact is that many people are looking to make a easy buck and if they can sue for it, so be it.

Where I disagree is the signs at the Kern seem to be needed to warn those dumb enough to think a inflected inner tube is a good raft to go down rapids to second guess themselves. Great. To me that sign is nothing more than a road sign warning about curvy road ahead or merging traffic. It is to save lives.

posted by ruralvoice on Jun 29, 2007 at 01:30 PM
Hi, Sam! Just wanted to see how the float was going....down the river......

The philosophy you espouse regarding signs, safety (when it comes to hidden hazards) and rivers is not productive in that those signs do save lives--plain and simple. Also, you generalize regarding rivers as if they are all alike. Personal responsibility is about making decisions (good or bad). Information, such as on signs, is used in those decisions.

Delete as you see fit.
posted by CurtDalton on Jul 23, 2007 at 06:19 AM
When I started my quest to have Caltrans allow the changeable message signs in Kern Canyon warn out-of-town visitors to stay out of the Kern River, I was 10 years younger and a whole lot more politically naïve. I actually thought our government was something that was responsible to the people – sort of a living, breathing entity that could change to benefit the public.   Boy, did I ever get a rude awakening!   It took ten years and countless hours and the only thing that kept this idea alive is the reaction I received from everyone I used as a sounding-board. Every single person I spoke with thought this was a terrific way to warn visitors to Bakersfield,  who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the danger posed by the swift waters of the Kern River.      Initially, my letters to Caltrans were unanswered as were my many emails. (Humm, aren’t these public employees supposed to answer their correspondence?   After receiving no answer to any of my correspondence, I had a brainstorm: Why not get local government on my side and let those who are politically powerful argue my cause for me?    With that thought in mind, I suspended my fear of public speaking and appeared before the Kern County Board of Supervisors to pitch my idea. To my delight, Supervisor Parra thought this was a fantastic idea and made a motion to refer this to KERNCOG with a recommendation for approval. Supervisor Perez seconded this motion and while I stood nervously at the podium, a vote was taken.    The vote was unanimous. ( )http://www.co.kern.ca.us/cl...   All of the Supervisors (Including the now forgetful Supervisor McQuiston) agreed warning people to avoid the dangers of the Kern River using the changeable message signs were a great idea.   I foolishly thought this could happen before the next summer’s influx of tourists and perhaps some lives could be saved. Those who are familiar with government may not be the least surprised that nothing happened with the changeable message signs. No doubt they are still laughing at my political naiveté.    The signs sat month after month at the mouth of the canyon, unused - waiting for a traffic accident or a body recovery to impede traffic flow before these expensive signs could be activated with a message to the drivers on Highway 178. A big, black, and very expensive un-used electronic billboard!   Visitors to our county continued to come to the Kern River for a cool respite from the summer’s heat and predictably, several lost their lives simply because they entered the swift waters of the Kern River completely ignorant of the danger the river poses to anyone lacking the protective equipment necessary to safely play in the river.   After watching the death toll continue to rise unabated, it was the unnecessary death of a father of six children that made me decide to start using the Bakersfield Californian Editorial Page to nudge the political powers to implement my plan to use the Caltrans signs to warn people to either stay out of the water or at least be aware the seemingly calm waters will kill you if you aren’t careful.    To my utter amazement, my letter was selected as letter of the month. To my sheer disbelief, I was contacted by Dianne Hardisty and told I was a contender for letter of the year. My college English teacher is no doubt rolling over in his grave.     Honestly, I couldn’t understand the institutional resistance to this idea from Caltrans. These changeable message signs are very expensive pieces of publicly owned equipment that sit un-used for over 99 percent of the time and with the flip of a switch, they could revert to their originally intended use and warn of a traffic delay.    Wouldn’t it make more sense to warn visitors to stay out of the river in the first place than to warn motorist’s traffic would be delayed due to a body recovery? What's the big deal? Seems like a common-sense idea to me but the bureaucrats at Caltrans would rather keep the signs un-used than save a life.   Such a waste of taxpayer-owned equipment!  Such a waste of life!   Finally, after spending untold hours trying to get this simple cost-effective plan implemented I came to the realization that no matter how good an idea is, no matter how many lives could be saved, it doesn’t matter a whit if a bureaucrat sitting at a desk somewhere doesn’t like it. Let the death continue - It's good office politics!   After spending years trying to get this idea off the ground, I gave up.   I rolled over and gave up; resigned to the fact your local and state government simply doesn’t give a damn about anything unless there are votes and campaign cash at stake. Caltrans administrators are appointed, not elected so nothing would ever come of it. I would just have to live with it. (This isn't something easy for a former Paramedic: Sitting on the sidelines and watching preventable death continue unabated!)   About three months ago, while driving to a business lunch, my cell phone rang and a member of The Bakersfield Californian Editorial staff advised me The Californian wanted to resurrect my campaign to utilize the Caltrans changeable message signs and wanted to know if I would be up for the challenge?    To be honest, my Yankee heritage chafes at giving up. I was raised by parents who were stubborn, opinionated New Englanders and I have been told my entire life anything worth having is worth fighting for. So before I could give it a lot of thought, the voice that is my conscience answered in an instant: “Sure, if it will prevent visitors to Kern County from dying in the Kern River, I’m all for it.”   After the Editorial appeared in The Californian with the Caltrans official’s phone number and e-mail address, I figured maybe, just maybe this time we could save some lives but after my previous ten years trying, I honestly held out little hope anyone was listening – let alone caring.   To my surprise Senator Dean Florez read the editorial and took it as a personal challenge to make this life-saving idea happen.     Now, I am an unapologetic conservative (NOT an unapologetic Republican – There IS a difference) and in the past I had taken Senator Florez to task for what I perceived as unnecessary grandstanding in the media, so Senator Florez championing MY cause left me speechless. I was grateful, but my latent distrust of ALL politicians left me with an “I’ll believe it when I see it” attitude. My original elation over the Board of Supervisors agreeing with me had turned into almost ten years of additional unnecessary deaths in the Kern River. To say I was skeptical, is the understatement of the decade. Even when his staff contacted me in person at work, I was skeptical it would really happen. - After all, since I first proposed this idea, a dozen preventable deaths have happened in the Kern Rivers swift waters.   To my surprise and delight, these signs were unveiled in the Kern River the next day.   To assure myself it wasn’t some kind of cruel trick I drove up Highway 178 after work to see these signs with my own eyes.  (I wasn't invited to the official unveiling of the signs)  I parked my car and walked up to the sign and gazed up at the simple message warning visitors 250 people have died in the Kern River’s waters. I reached out and touched the sign, pondering the ten year battle and came to the conclusion all of the aggravation was worth it if it reaches out to just one person and saves just one life.    People can leave Kern County after visiting returning home with pleasant memories of fun near the River instead of living a life of anguish at having lost a loved one simply because they never knew the Kern River’s reputation of inviting you into her cool water and killing you for your slightest mistake.   An obituary in the July 4th, 2007 Bakersfield Californian says it all:   “Look closely at this picture. [Picture shown-Page B3] This is my 7-year-old daughter, my little “noonie” a cross between Pippi Longstocking and Cinderella, she made all of our raindrops into lemon drops and gumdrops. Her smile, her giggle, even her little runny nose, these things I miss so much. But mostly, I miss her arms around me; I won’t feel them again because she drowned in the Kern River on the 4th of July. She drowned with her daddy, Brett Schafer and her cousin, Joshua Patton. Don’t let this happen to your loved ones.  BE SAFE, BE SMART, BE RESPONSIBLE. Things like this happen in a blink of an eye.”   In Loving Memory of Micaela Sherre Schafter, January 27, 1991 to July 4, 1998.   Could these changeable message signs saved this wonderful little girl, her father and her cousin? We will never ever know. Dead men (and children) tell no tales.   I have cut out this obituary and I carry it in my wallet.  Whenever I start to second-guess myself I will pull it out and read it to remind myself sometimes fighting the good fight isn’t easy but in the end it IS worth the effort.   So far, we have watched Memorial Day and the Fourth of July holidays pass without a single loss of life in the Kern River.  To me, these signs have proved to be an unqualified success at preventing unnecessary death.  However, now these signs are in place, one of the Kern County Supervisors has developed complete amnesia of his original vote to go forward with this plan and a small group of merchants in the Kern River Valley are labeling me a hysterical” fear monger.  They are putting profit ahead of public safety by actively working to have these signs removed.   I can only hope this supervisor grows a memory (and conscience) and these profit-minded merchants have to fight just as hard to have these signs removed as I fought to have them installed and in the end, the public will find out if  political contributions take precedence over public safety.
posted by samheath on Jul 23, 2007 at 06:58 AM
I'm not a merchant and wish the dam had not been built, that this area were the same as I remember it when the river was unrestricted. You seem to want to ignore the main point I have made about personal accountability, of where such things like signs along the river is leading us toward ever lessening personal accountability. I may yet live long enough to find the river posted with "No Swimming" signs.
posted by CurtDalton on Jul 23, 2007 at 07:36 AM

Sam:

 

To me these signs are about education not personal accountability.  If you read the sign THEN go in the river anyway, then it would, in fact, be about personal accountability. 

 

Like the skull & crossbones on the 1950's bottle of iodine, these signs are to warn out of town visitors the waters of the Kern are not cool and inviting- they are dangerous!

 

Pray tell, how can an out of town visitor know of the danger if we residents don't tell them?  

 

Therein lies the paradox. 

 

We soundly criticize parents for letting their kids swim in the dangerous waters of the Kern River yet how can this same father know of the danger to his family? 

 

Telepathy? 

 

It doesn't work that way.  If you know the danger and fail to communicate it to the visitor, you are aiding and abetting the deaths.  It's not nannyism, its education and there is a difference.

1 2

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.