Search:

The Weedpatch Gazette

A blog about Personal Journals.
About samheath


Real Name:
Samuel Heath
Member Since:
February 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
July 23, 2008
Profile Views:
4605
Blog Views:
51734
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Sound and Fury Signifying Something
The Weedpatch Gazette
Things are ok here in Bodfish
A Government of Lunatics
Yes, as a matter of fact, things are going to hell!
Hotter than Bakersfield!
Where would Jesus begin cleansing the Temple today?
Orbs and Butterflies
The Vultures are Circling
Books and Writing
Archives
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
samheath - > The Weedpatch Gazette -> Fun with Bill and Hill
Fun with Bill and Hill

A very likable old fellow had a running joke among the patrons of one pub I used to frequent here in the Kern River Valley that he was planning on going to Tahiti as soon as he could get enough women to row the boat. Unlike Alec Baldwin who threatened to leave the country if Bush was elected, I am not going to make such a threat if Hillary is elected, though thoughts of Tahiti do come to mind.

Ok, so such thoughts of going to Tahiti have nothing to do with Hillary even if she was willing to do the rowing. However, since politicians have made such shipwreck of America anyway and will continue to do so no matter who holds what office I want to look at the bright side. Regardless of how much I despise the Clintons, much as it may be considered gallows humor I think of Ms. Clinton becoming President as “Fun with Bill and Hill.”

You know, the Bush administration hasn’t been much fun, and all bets may be off should Bush decide to go out in a blaze of glory by nuking Iran. But though macabre in some respects I view the Bill and Hill scenario with some degree of potential humor. Certainly the White House gossip would take a turn for the better, enriching both MSM and the tabloids, and interns would once more find their proper sexual role in the scheme of things.

Given to whimsy as I often am, it is fun to imagine Bill’s wife divorcing him as soon as she was elected. That would be a real hoot. But practically speaking, no matter how delicious the idea, the two are such political animals I don’t give that much chance of happening. Now thoughts of the Borgias do come to mind, but which of the Clintons would gain by one poisoning the other? Despite the Constitutional limitations, which would prove very disagreeable for Bill, neither he nor his wife would find murder at all disagreeable in achieving their ends as their dark past suggests though they might draw the line at murdering each other; not from affection but because it would be politically undesirable.

On the plus side, Hillary might bring back the White House furniture, linens, silverware she stole when she left the last time. All the computer keyboards that were missing the “w’s” have been replaced so that would not be a bother. However, attention would have to be paid to possible computer viruses that might have been encrypted by Bush cronies. Imagine Hillary trying to reach the ambassador in China and instead launching a nuke.

When it comes to race, the Clintons are admirably suited to winning minority approval by substituting the old “Forty acres and a mule, free watermelons and chickens” with things like “free healthcare.” And of course they will now add “free piñatas” to sweeten the deal. Thing of it is, they will not view these political promises as being racist.

People like Bill O’Reilly are not racist. They are guilty of being condescending and patronizing, something more insidious than overt racism. One of the major factors that enabled me to be a successful teacher in Watts is that I was never condescending nor patronizing. The grievous thing about people like the Clintons and O’Reilly is they seem oblivious to being so. It is a distinction of the wealthy and politicians that live such insulated lives they never have to deal with the circumstances that create the more ugly facts underlying racism. Because of this insulation from reality, they seem unaware of how hateful their condescension and patronization of those they unconsciously consider inferior really is.

For my part, I much prefer the in your face racism of Al Sharpton. He does not condescend, he does not patronize; he is the preeminent pickpocket that warns in advance he is going to pick your pocket. You know exactly where you stand with people like Sharpton. He is a thoroughgoing racist, a lying, cheating scoundrel and flim flam man that makes no apologies for being such. It says something about the MSM that find him such a darling. Jesse Jackson would do well to drop his pretense of being anything other than Sharpton, though Jackson could never be anywhere near as funny.

Despite it being Machiavellian in the extreme inviting the total destruction of America, given the total disaster of the Bush administration and my personal belief the Devil chooses those he wants in power, the electorate may opt for the familiarity of Bill and Hill. There is just something about that kind of comfortable familiarity that calls to mind:

Vice is a monster of such frightful mien

As to be hated needs but to be seen;

Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face,

We first endure, then pity, then embrace.

Alexander Pope (1688-1744)

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by samheath on Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 182 times
18 comments from 8 users

1 2

posted by rm6 on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:03 PM

The Stupidest Things President George W. Bush Has Ever Said

10) "Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream." —LaCrosse, Wis., Oct. 18, 2000

9) "I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." —Greater Nashua, N.H., Jan. 27, 2000

8) "I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004

7) "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." —Saginaw, Mich., Sept. 29, 2000

6) "You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005

5) "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004

4) "They misunderestimated me." —Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000

3) "Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?" —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000

2) "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004

1) "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002

I have to say that this list trumps any list of idiotic stuff that Hillary ever said.
posted by GregL on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:05 PM
Rick, I swear you're the old 'Aero'!  Come on, come clean!  Those are some choice quotes, but I love #5 the best!
posted by samheath on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:13 PM
If politicians weren't given to being asses from the git-go, they will usually prove it by their words.
posted by rm6 on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:26 PM

true...anyone willing to bear the responsibility of being the President of the United States (aka leader of the free world) has to be a litte crazy in the first place

posted by madkow2747 on Sep 26, 2007 at 07:20 PM
Your description of Al Sharpton is hilarious!!  It's sort of a guilty pleasure of mine, but I love listening to him talk- just to see what he's going to say next!
I don't mind if the Clintons get back in the White House.  Just another administration to pick on, to agree with, and to disagree with.  All presidents do some good things and some bad things and hopefully they leave the country a little better off.  I'm intensely curious to see if the American people can bring themselves to elect a woman president!  I don't care if she's nutty- that in itself would make my day!
posted by Xcite on Sep 26, 2007 at 08:58 PM

20 years ago we had Bush Sr. then 8 years of Bill Clinton then 8 years of Bush Jr. now maybe another Clinton for the next 4 to 8 years. DOES ANYONE SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH ONLY 2 FAMILIES CONTROLLING OUR COUNTRY FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS AND MAYBE FOR THE NEXT 8 ?

If Clinton wins then 24 to 28 years of Clinton and Bush this is not democracy!

posted by samheath on Sep 27, 2007 at 05:03 AM
Politicians too often leave us in the position of not knowing whether to laugh or cry. Sometimes when undecided I simply scream.
posted by Colitas on Sep 27, 2007 at 06:37 AM
I don't believe an affair is an end all to a marriage....various affairs, that's different.  No one knows what goes on in a marriage except the two that are married....best friends, therapist, family, etc.  I'm not a believer in "Stand by your Man" under any circumstances.  With Hillary bashing the women, that's normal.  At least for a women.  Don't get me wrong, the other women take that vow, the husband did.  So I'm not one to normally to jump the bandwagon about bashing the "Other woman".  Of course circumstances differ, but on the norm that's how I feel.  I don't believe in the defense that "But he/she came on to me first!", B.S.  I don't believe Hillary needed to air out her dirty laundry either.  She should have kept her mouth shut on both the women and Bill.  But again, they weren't "normal folk".  There was a lot more at stake there.  It wasn't "Mr. Jones, our neighbor, cheated on Mrs. Jones".  He was the President and I am sure she had plans then to run.  Well she did for Congress.  So that's me two cents. 
posted by samheath on Sep 27, 2007 at 07:14 AM
And a very good two cents Colitas, though not to disregard the legitimate criticism.
posted by Colitas on Sep 27, 2007 at 08:04 AM
Rickenbacker, I apologize on missing the "point'.  Plus I never said I did or didn't believed anything had to say.  I thought you wanted women's point of view on affairs.  My bad.  I didn't realize it was just another political bashing post.   And I think I did mention the fact that I believe Hillary had her own agendas with the political aspect or repercussions, hence my analogy on "Mr and Mrs. Jones". 
posted by Colitas on Sep 27, 2007 at 08:57 AM

Rickenbacker, in asking a woman's point of view on Hillary accepting and approving of all Bill's affairs., you have to get a women's opinion on "affairs" period, right?  And no, I don't not believe that it should affect her candidacy for President.  Not that I am voting for her, but my decision has nothing to do with the fact that she and her husband handle their problems between themselves and not in the press.  Do you think JFK  would have been re-elected if he hadn't died?  Was his main goal not on his marriage and family?  If  their main goal is solely on their marriage and family, how are they going to be focusing on what is good for the American people?  You're making it sound like the only requirement for a good President is his/her marriage and family.  What if he/she didn't have either?  A marriage or a family.  Or what if he/she is divorced?  Should a divorcee be disqualified automatically because he/she wasn't focused on the marriage?

posted by Colitas on Sep 27, 2007 at 10:27 AM
Rickenbacker, I think you are right about that.  Come on people, someone else must have an option on this beside us two = )
posted by oohchild on Sep 27, 2007 at 11:39 AM

What was Clinton's response, rick?

It would be nice if you provided a link to this quote. Most sites require it, for copyright purposes.

posted by madkow2747 on Sep 27, 2007 at 12:20 PM
Here we go, another woman's point of view on Hillary accepting and approving of Bill's affairs:  It's all up to the individual woman.  Some women are into it, open marriages and the like ;)  It sounds to me more like a marriage of convenience than anything and I don't hold that against her.  Just like the affairs themselves, I don't think it's anybodys business but theirs.  
It's sort of insulting to hear that you believe that a woman is a bad person because her marriage and family aren't her number one priorities.  Some women aren't family people.  For many men, power is a number one priority; why shouldn't it be so for women?  Anyone seeking the presidency has to want power and aggressively seek it.  You can't just stumble into the presidency by being an intelligent and good-natured family person.
And as for corruption in campaign contributions, you can bet that the contributors are being gone over with a fine-tooth comb by watchdog groups.  Maybe her campaign didn't know everything about that particular fundraiser.  And she returned the money- so what's the big deal?
posted by oohchild on Sep 27, 2007 at 12:23 PM

Well, a "news" site that posts questions without the responses is hardly doing a good job, wouldn't you say?

Anyway, it's pretty easy to google Meet The Press to find the transcripts of past shows.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id...

I happen to agree with her that we need campaign reform for public funding of candidate's fund raising. It would eliminate a whole host of problems with elections in this country.

1 2

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.