|
The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Fun with Bill and Hill
A very likable old fellow had a running joke among the patrons of one pub I used to frequent here in the Kern River Valley that he was planning on going to Tahiti as soon as he could get enough women to row the boat. Unlike Alec Baldwin who threatened to leave the country if Bush was elected, I am not going to make such a threat if Hillary is elected, though thoughts of Tahiti do come to mind. Ok, so such thoughts of going to Tahiti have nothing to do with Hillary even if she was willing to do the rowing. However, since politicians have made such shipwreck of America anyway and will continue to do so no matter who holds what office I want to look at the bright side. Regardless of how much I despise the Clintons, much as it may be considered gallows humor I think of Ms. Clinton becoming President as “Fun with Bill and Hill.” You know, the Bush administration hasn’t been much fun, and all bets may be off should Bush decide to go out in a blaze of glory by nuking Iran. But though macabre in some respects I view the Bill and Hill scenario with some degree of potential humor. Certainly the White House gossip would take a turn for the better, enriching both MSM and the tabloids, and interns would once more find their proper sexual role in the scheme of things. Given to whimsy as I often am, it is fun to imagine Bill’s wife divorcing him as soon as she was elected. That would be a real hoot. But practically speaking, no matter how delicious the idea, the two are such political animals I don’t give that much chance of happening. Now thoughts of the Borgias do come to mind, but which of the Clintons would gain by one poisoning the other? Despite the Constitutional limitations, which would prove very disagreeable for Bill, neither he nor his wife would find murder at all disagreeable in achieving their ends as their dark past suggests though they might draw the line at murdering each other; not from affection but because it would be politically undesirable. On the plus side, Hillary might bring back the White House furniture, linens, silverware she stole when she left the last time. All the computer keyboards that were missing the “w’s” have been replaced so that would not be a bother. However, attention would have to be paid to possible computer viruses that might have been encrypted by Bush cronies. Imagine Hillary trying to reach the ambassador in China and instead launching a nuke. When it comes to race, the Clintons are admirably suited to winning minority approval by substituting the old “Forty acres and a mule, free watermelons and chickens” with things like “free healthcare.” And of course they will now add “free piñatas” to sweeten the deal. Thing of it is, they will not view these political promises as being racist. People like Bill O’Reilly are not racist. They are guilty of being condescending and patronizing, something more insidious than overt racism. One of the major factors that enabled me to be a successful teacher in Watts is that I was never condescending nor patronizing. The grievous thing about people like the Clintons and O’Reilly is they seem oblivious to being so. It is a distinction of the wealthy and politicians that live such insulated lives they never have to deal with the circumstances that create the more ugly facts underlying racism. Because of this insulation from reality, they seem unaware of how hateful their condescension and patronization of those they unconsciously consider inferior really is. For my part, I much prefer the in your face racism of Al Sharpton. He does not condescend, he does not patronize; he is the preeminent pickpocket that warns in advance he is going to pick your pocket. You know exactly where you stand with people like Sharpton. He is a thoroughgoing racist, a lying, cheating scoundrel and flim flam man that makes no apologies for being such. It says something about the MSM that find him such a darling. Jesse Jackson would do well to drop his pretense of being anything other than Sharpton, though Jackson could never be anywhere near as funny. Despite it being Machiavellian in the extreme inviting the total destruction of America, given the total disaster of the Bush administration and my personal belief the Devil chooses those he wants in power, the electorate may opt for the familiarity of Bill and Hill. There is just something about that kind of comfortable familiarity that calls to mind: Vice is a monster of such frightful mien As to be hated needs but to be seen; Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face, We first endure, then pity, then embrace. Alexander Pope (1688-1744) 18 comments from 8 users
posted by
rm6
on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:03 PM
The Stupidest Things President George W. Bush Has Ever Said10) "Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream." —LaCrosse, Wis., Oct. 18, 20009) "I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." —Greater Nashua, N.H., Jan. 27, 2000 8) "I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004 7) "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." —Saginaw, Mich., Sept. 29, 2000 6) "You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005 5) "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004 4) "They misunderestimated me." —Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000 3) "Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?" —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000 2) "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004 1) "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 I have to say that this list trumps any list of idiotic stuff that Hillary ever said. posted by
GregL
on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:05 PM
posted by
samheath
on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:13 PM
posted by
rm6
on Sep 26, 2007 at 04:26 PM
true...anyone willing to bear the responsibility of being the President of the United States (aka leader of the free world) has to be a litte crazy in the first place posted by
madkow2747
on Sep 26, 2007 at 07:20 PM
I don't mind if the Clintons get back in the White House. Just another administration to pick on, to agree with, and to disagree with. All presidents do some good things and some bad things and hopefully they leave the country a little better off. I'm intensely curious to see if the American people can bring themselves to elect a woman president! I don't care if she's nutty- that in itself would make my day! posted by
Xcite
on Sep 26, 2007 at 08:58 PM
20 years ago we had Bush Sr. then 8 years of Bill Clinton then 8 years of Bush Jr. now maybe another Clinton for the next 4 to 8 years. DOES ANYONE SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH ONLY 2 FAMILIES CONTROLLING OUR COUNTRY FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS AND MAYBE FOR THE NEXT 8 ? If Clinton wins then 24 to 28 years of Clinton and Bush this is not democracy! posted by
samheath
on Sep 27, 2007 at 05:03 AM
posted by
Colitas
on Sep 27, 2007 at 06:37 AM
posted by
samheath
on Sep 27, 2007 at 07:14 AM
posted by
Colitas
on Sep 27, 2007 at 08:04 AM
posted by
Colitas
on Sep 27, 2007 at 08:57 AM
Rickenbacker, in asking a woman's point of view on Hillary accepting and approving of all Bill's affairs., you have to get a women's opinion on "affairs" period, right? And no, I don't not believe that it should affect her candidacy for President. Not that I am voting for her, but my decision has nothing to do with the fact that she and her husband handle their problems between themselves and not in the press. Do you think JFK would have been re-elected if he hadn't died? Was his main goal not on his marriage and family? If their main goal is solely on their marriage and family, how are they going to be focusing on what is good for the American people? You're making it sound like the only requirement for a good President is his/her marriage and family. What if he/she didn't have either? A marriage or a family. Or what if he/she is divorced? Should a divorcee be disqualified automatically because he/she wasn't focused on the marriage? posted by
Colitas
on Sep 27, 2007 at 10:27 AM
posted by
oohchild
on Sep 27, 2007 at 11:39 AM
What was Clinton's response, rick? It would be nice if you provided a link to this quote. Most sites require it, for copyright purposes. posted by
madkow2747
on Sep 27, 2007 at 12:20 PM
It's sort of insulting to hear that you believe that a woman is a bad person because her marriage and family aren't her number one priorities. Some women aren't family people. For many men, power is a number one priority; why shouldn't it be so for women? Anyone seeking the presidency has to want power and aggressively seek it. You can't just stumble into the presidency by being an intelligent and good-natured family person. And as for corruption in campaign contributions, you can bet that the contributors are being gone over with a fine-tooth comb by watchdog groups. Maybe her campaign didn't know everything about that particular fundraiser. And she returned the money- so what's the big deal? posted by
oohchild
on Sep 27, 2007 at 12:23 PM
Well, a "news" site that posts questions without the responses is hardly doing a good job, wouldn't you say? Anyway, it's pretty easy to google Meet The Press to find the transcripts of past shows. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id... I happen to agree with her that we need campaign reform for public funding of candidate's fund raising. It would eliminate a whole host of problems with elections in this country. |