Search:

The Weedpatch Gazette

A blog about Personal Journals.
About samheath


Real Name:
Samuel Heath
Member Since:
February 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
September 06, 2008
Profile Views:
4661
Blog Views:
52863
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
Archives
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
samheath - > The Weedpatch Gazette -> Fun with Bill and Hill
Fun with Bill and Hill

A very likable old fellow had a running joke among the patrons of one pub I used to frequent here in the Kern River Valley that he was planning on going to Tahiti as soon as he could get enough women to row the boat. Unlike Alec Baldwin who threatened to leave the country if Bush was elected, I am not going to make such a threat if Hillary is elected, though thoughts of Tahiti do come to mind.

Ok, so such thoughts of going to Tahiti have nothing to do with Hillary even if she was willing to do the rowing. However, since politicians have made such shipwreck of America anyway and will continue to do so no matter who holds what office I want to look at the bright side. Regardless of how much I despise the Clintons, much as it may be considered gallows humor I think of Ms. Clinton becoming President as “Fun with Bill and Hill.”

You know, the Bush administration hasn’t been much fun, and all bets may be off should Bush decide to go out in a blaze of glory by nuking Iran. But though macabre in some respects I view the Bill and Hill scenario with some degree of potential humor. Certainly the White House gossip would take a turn for the better, enriching both MSM and the tabloids, and interns would once more find their proper sexual role in the scheme of things.

Given to whimsy as I often am, it is fun to imagine Bill’s wife divorcing him as soon as she was elected. That would be a real hoot. But practically speaking, no matter how delicious the idea, the two are such political animals I don’t give that much chance of happening. Now thoughts of the Borgias do come to mind, but which of the Clintons would gain by one poisoning the other? Despite the Constitutional limitations, which would prove very disagreeable for Bill, neither he nor his wife would find murder at all disagreeable in achieving their ends as their dark past suggests though they might draw the line at murdering each other; not from affection but because it would be politically undesirable.

On the plus side, Hillary might bring back the White House furniture, linens, silverware she stole when she left the last time. All the computer keyboards that were missing the “w’s” have been replaced so that would not be a bother. However, attention would have to be paid to possible computer viruses that might have been encrypted by Bush cronies. Imagine Hillary trying to reach the ambassador in China and instead launching a nuke.

When it comes to race, the Clintons are admirably suited to winning minority approval by substituting the old “Forty acres and a mule, free watermelons and chickens” with things like “free healthcare.” And of course they will now add “free piñatas” to sweeten the deal. Thing of it is, they will not view these political promises as being racist.

People like Bill O’Reilly are not racist. They are guilty of being condescending and patronizing, something more insidious than overt racism. One of the major factors that enabled me to be a successful teacher in Watts is that I was never condescending nor patronizing. The grievous thing about people like the Clintons and O’Reilly is they seem oblivious to being so. It is a distinction of the wealthy and politicians that live such insulated lives they never have to deal with the circumstances that create the more ugly facts underlying racism. Because of this insulation from reality, they seem unaware of how hateful their condescension and patronization of those they unconsciously consider inferior really is.

For my part, I much prefer the in your face racism of Al Sharpton. He does not condescend, he does not patronize; he is the preeminent pickpocket that warns in advance he is going to pick your pocket. You know exactly where you stand with people like Sharpton. He is a thoroughgoing racist, a lying, cheating scoundrel and flim flam man that makes no apologies for being such. It says something about the MSM that find him such a darling. Jesse Jackson would do well to drop his pretense of being anything other than Sharpton, though Jackson could never be anywhere near as funny.

Despite it being Machiavellian in the extreme inviting the total destruction of America, given the total disaster of the Bush administration and my personal belief the Devil chooses those he wants in power, the electorate may opt for the familiarity of Bill and Hill. There is just something about that kind of comfortable familiarity that calls to mind:

Vice is a monster of such frightful mien

As to be hated needs but to be seen;

Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face,

We first endure, then pity, then embrace.

Alexander Pope (1688-1744)

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by samheath on Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 183 times
18 comments from 8 users

1 2

posted by countygirl on Sep 27, 2007 at 01:08 PM

Why in the world would we want someone who has said this.. "God bless the America we are trying to create." ..running for president? Thousands have given their lives so that we'd have the America we are today and yet that isn't good enough for her. She is running for something she isn't even proud of!!

As far as Hillary not being a family person...or at least not making her family her number one priority, I say, "Great! Let's have the poster child for dysfunctional families running our country."  Want to know one of the main things ruining our country.... the fact that family isn't our number one priority.  Let's prove this and put another Clinton into office!!  One last thing.... I'll NEVER understand why women put up with cheating husbands, unless you're Hillary and you need your hound to get into office!!

posted by oohchild on Sep 27, 2007 at 02:37 PM

How do you know when Clinton started supporting campaign finance reform, Rick? You weren't even interested in her answers to the initial questions!

Seems like you're the one with the pre-conceived notions there.

Really, folks, if your priority in the Presidential election is the "family values" of the candidate, you've got some pretty slim pickens to choose from. Personally, I'm more interested in their approach to the war. That's number one for me. In 1992, the motto was: "It's the economy, stupid." In 2008, for me, the motto is: "It's the war in Iraq, stupid."

A question for Rick & countygirl: I googled that quote y'all printed, and I couldn't find an original source for it. In fact, the only websites I could find with that quote were either right-wing blogs or libertarian chat rooms. Could you source that for me, so we can see it in context? A lot of the quotes Rick listed were taken out of context, y'know.

posted by oohchild on Sep 27, 2007 at 03:31 PM

First, you already know I'm an Edwards supporter, Rick. Second, I'm still waiting for that source regarding Clinton's so-called quote. Third, check out the Rasmussen polls when Clinton is put up against the leading Republican candidates:

http://tpmelectioncentral.c...

She leads them all.

Fourth, I still wonder what you think about a "news" site that doesn't print responses to questions posed to a candidate.

1 2

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.