|
God and Freedom vs. Bush Cult and Fascism Bush Cult Worship of Mammon Posing As God July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
God and Freedom vs. Bush Cult and Fascism
Our Founding Fathers were rare men of courage who had the insight and intellect to understand that God dwells within the soul of every human being and that the only choice we have in that matter is to acknowledge or reject His presence. Acceptance of His presence and impeccability of the Word brings freedom and enlightened truth. Rejection brings fear, darkness, deception, and dishonor. In that simple premise the promise of democracy is born. God speaks through the will of the people. The people of The Reich seems to have inculcated their lies so repeatedly with every administration that only those who love the wool being pulled over their eyes don’t know that “Republican” is synonymous with “corruption”. Bush Cultists are divided into two camps: those who are actively engaged in the decimation of our democracy, and those who are too damned stupid to wake up and believe their own eyes for the sake of “party loyalty”. They want us to ‘clap if you believe in fairies’ and believe that Tinkerbelle has nothing to do with the immoral enriching of the wealthy 1% through the pillaging of this nation and the destruction, occupation, and war profiteering in other nations. 18 comments from 11 users
posted by
LoriMorales
on Jul 27, 2007 at 11:11 PM
WOW - I guess I just have to ask: Rejection, exactly of what, brings, and I quote from your diatribe, "fear, darkness, deception and dishonor?" God speaks though the will of the people? Really? Are you absolutely positive? Personally, I haven't heard God speaking though anyone - particularly this post. Could it be I haven't been to your church lately? Please tell me the exact location you have found God speaking - thru whatever source. I'm feeling pretty confident that God doesn't hold hate, contempt and disregard for someone because of their political affiliation. I mean, did God know we were gonna have Democrats, Republicans, Independants, Green Party ... etc? If he did know because of the "big book in the sky" which decreed everything, everybody and every happening, did he discrimate between anything, anybody or any happening? Well, that's ridiculous, don't ya think? You think God prefers the Democrats over the Republicans? Again .... Really? I was kinda hoping he was looking over the Anaheim Angels. They do an enormous amount of genuflecting and, if God is watching, he must be impressed and will in turn, provide a fabulous win. What are your thoughts on all this? posted by
Rbuch
on Jul 28, 2007 at 03:09 PM
God is a Republican. Just ask our president.
In their many conversations, God has not only revealed his party affiliation to Bush, but has chosen our president to be His enforcer here on earth. God help us all! Russ Buchanan posted by
rm6
on Jul 28, 2007 at 11:32 PM
My thoughts on the subject were deleted (or maybe there was a glitch on the page, I donno). Honestly, wbuck, did you play samheath and delete the comment or did the comment just not show up at all? posted by
bigdog
on Jul 29, 2007 at 12:04 AM
posted by
anonymous
on Jul 29, 2007 at 08:16 AM
"SO MANY RELIGIONS, BUT ONLY ONE GOD, I DON'T NEED ANOTHER SAVIOR" Ozzy posted by
wbuck
on Jul 29, 2007 at 11:26 AM
Comments thus fer have all been on peripheral issues I've used to make a point. The point seems to have missed by everyone.
1. What is Youngbloods motivation to circumvent the will of the people of the state of California. A.. The Reichs need to instill fear into the populace they consider as their property? B. His own propensity for occasional drunken stupor C. His own fear of truth D. He has plans to eliminate competition for his own profit, in a personal traffick ring E. He has a side contract with big Pharma and wants only those drugs sold that have major contraindications and cause more problems than they solve, much like the republiCON party itself. (I'm not suggesting that any of these are true, just trying to get to the core of his dark motivations.) 2. For a party that constantly touts states rights and individual responsibility, they seem to have a common personality trait that runs away from responsibility and as a group they seem to always require a scapegoat and someone to "throw under the bus". A responsible republiCON is an oxy-moron. A. Treason by eliminating a major asset through outing a CIA operative is OK because it serves a political agenda but a misguided young man with the courage of his convictions serving as a foot-soldier on a battlefied is imprisoned (John Walker Lyndh) B. A brain dead woman with nothing but mush in her cranium and on a feeding tube is cause for Tinkerbelle to interupt his perpetual vacation in order to overrule states rights and the rights of the husband to allow the body of his spouse to follow where her mind has gone . C. Constantly telling us that the "Generals on the Ground" are being listened to as they consistantly eliminate those Generals with the courage to speak the truth in favor of those who would allow this nation to disintegrate and serve as cowardly sycophants and adhere to party dogma for the sake of their own careers. Honestly, I have made no claim that God has any preference to one party or another. That would be the same mindset that the so-called Chrisian Right claims when they insist that they have the trademark and copyright to all things holy and moral and that any use of Gods name entitles them to an honorarium ( OK that is hyperbole folks just to be clear to those of you who simply don't get it) Most of these comments tell me that none of you should ever be invited to my home for a game of darts unless I want my walls totaly perforated. I would like to think that there is at least the occasional individual capable of free thought here in Tehachapi but it seems that trait has been domesticated and/or beaten and/or scared right out of most of these commentators. I will not respond to imbeciles who are unable to find the point of the message. Hop posted by
anonymous
on Jul 29, 2007 at 11:59 AM
Can anyone say "Conspiracy Theory". This blog seems to be way out in left field.
posted by
wbuck
on Jul 29, 2007 at 01:38 PM
Yes, of course. Anything that would cause people to actually think for themselves is automatically scoffed at or ridiculed by those who think that Honor, Integrity, Truth are mere platitudes. Your inability to add anything at all to the discussion renders you irrelevant at the onset.
Try reading something called a "book". A good start would be "The Four Agreements" by Don Miguel Ruiz. Perhaps your posts would become nowhere nearly as insipid and trite and some intellectual substance might actually become part of your existence. Yes, I've broken my word on not responding to imbeciles. posted by
countygirl
on Jul 29, 2007 at 01:49 PM
Why should anyone who does not follow your "free" thinking respond to you? Even if it was extremely intelligent and had many valid points you would dismiss it based on the fact that it didn't follow your lines of thinking. You have made it quite clear that anyone who opposes your OPINIONS are unable to think for themselves and are mindless imbeciles. For the record this kind of "free" thinking.... B. A brain dead woman with nothing but mush in her cranium and on a feeding tube is cause for Tinkerbelle to interrupt his perpetual vacation in order to overrule states rights and the rights of the husband to allow the body of his spouse to follow where her mind has gone ...... Makes me sick to my stomach. I suppose this kind of thinking in your world renders me mindless so maybe my husband should be able to kill me off too,huh?
posted by
rm6
on Jul 29, 2007 at 07:26 PM
This blog is so far out in left field that IT is irrelevant from the onset. If everyone has missed the point thus far, why don't you tell us what it is, or better yet, word your post a bit more clearly next time. Don't make yourself look like a hypocrite by calling us imbeciles, you are no better than anyone else here, even if you use words such as "platitudes" and "trite." You posted something that people find disagreeable and it is our right to disagree. posted by
wbuck
on Jul 30, 2007 at 09:26 AM
I am still waiting for someone to comment on the central premis of the post Why is Donny Youngblood dismissing the will of the people of the state of California?
Country Girl seems to have assigned herself to the same vegetative state as Terry Schiavo presuming those circumstances as the same as hers. rm6 appears upset at my choice of words. I do applaud this person for finding use of a dictionary. EVERYONE has a right to disagree with what I say but it would be really nice if someone were able to offer an intellegent argument presented thoughtfully rather than simply hurling invectives. I accept "left wing free thinker" as I have used forms of "Reich wing mind controled thought slaves". So fair is fair. In your world men kissing men is unholy and perverse and slaughtering hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children in foreign lands to steal their natural resources is "holy" and "just" as well as profitable for those holding all the wealth, or god as he is defined by the Reich. My God is not "elsewhere" as is yours. Human beings all over the planet know right from wrong, they all feel love the same, they all protect those they love the same. In this country that ability to distinguish the difference has been perverted by the likes of the "Decider" who is the same as a "Dictator". Someone care to explain the difference between those two terms? On the plus side, I sense that there are people out there who are beginning to think. That is always encouraging. Keep up the good work, all of you. You will find your essential human element yet, I have confidence your thought process has not been completely corrupted . posted by
anonymous
on Jul 30, 2007 at 09:47 AM
wbuck, keep waiting.
posted by
GregL
on Jul 30, 2007 at 10:41 AM
posted by
wbuck
on Jul 30, 2007 at 10:44 AM
I have only posed a question and posited possible motivations. I have made zero claims against Youngblood. I have used this forum to provoke a thoughtful response. Thus far, there have been zero.
The ground rules clearly state no profanity or personal attacks and to please comment on the subject of the blog post itself. I admit to using rhetoric and hyperbole in an effort to stir passion and provoke thought. Somewhat in keeping with the Socratic method of truth seeking. Is that level of thoughtful consideration really that difficult? Has the assault on reason really been that effective? Is the fear so great in all of you that you only feel safe in the most shallow end of the gene pool? God gave you a mind for a purpose. Do not fear God. The natural response to fear is hatred. Love, God, the natural response to love is understanding and after everything is said and done, God is love. Peace, love, harmony, and understanding, Hop posted by
rm6
on Jul 30, 2007 at 03:02 PM
Observational wise, God is not love, God, or the idea of God, is responsible for humanity's greatest problems and the violence that has unequivocally followed. If you think that there have been personal attacks here, then try not to insult your fellow bloggers by generalizing all of them as "imbeciles." |