<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#">
    <channel>
        <title>CITY JOKESITE! - TEHACHAPI SAFETY, SECURITY AND POLITICAL ISSUES - jimr&apos;s Blog - Tehachapi News</title>
        <link>http://www.tehachapinews.com/home/Blog/jimr/5545</link>
        <description>Silly me. Here I was ragging on the City Hall website for having their &amp;quot;latest&amp;quot; Newsletter dated November, 2004 and I just discovered their latest &amp;quot;Election Results&amp;quot; dated Nov. 2, 2004.
I think they are stuck in a time warp from 2004 and can&#039;t seem to go forward.
Do you think someone should offer to take over their so-called website?
Jim Richards
</description>
        <itunes:summary>Silly me. Here I was ragging on the City Hall website for having their &amp;quot;latest&amp;quot; Newsletter dated November, 2004 and I just discovered their latest &amp;quot;Election Results&amp;quot; dated Nov. 2, 2004.
I think they are stuck in a time warp from 2004 and can&#039;t seem to go forward.
Do you think someone should offer to take over their so-called website?
Jim Richards
</itunes:summary>
        <language>en-us</language>

                
                    <item>
                <title>Feb 6,  2007 at 08:02 PM : Jim, I couldn&#039;t...</title>
                <description>Jim, I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. The purpose of a governmental (or any for that matter) website is to provide pertinent and up-to-date information to concerned constituents. It is obvious that information dated to November 2004 is &amp;quot;out of date&amp;quot; to say the very least. My advice to the city is to hand the website responsibilities over to a community member and/or to a web management company. Not only will this ensure that content is updated on a regular basis, it will also eliminate any hardship placed on the city as a result of this website. The only other advice I can give is for those in city hall can get off of their rears and make things happen on their own. What a concept!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steven C. Vogel</description>
                <link>http://www.tehachapinews.com/home/Blog/jimr/5545/#c_55637</link>
                <guid>http://www.tehachapinews.com/home/Blog/jimr/5545/#c_55637</guid>
                <itunes:summary>Jim, I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. The purpose of a governmental (or any for that matter) website is to provide pertinent and up-to-date information to concerned constituents. It is obvious that information dated to November 2004 is &amp;quot;out of date&amp;quot; to say the very least. My advice to the city is to hand the website responsibilities over to a community member and/or to a web management company. Not only will this ensure that content is updated on a regular basis, it will also eliminate any hardship placed on the city as a result of this website. The only other advice I can give is for those in city hall can get off of their rears and make things happen on their own. What a concept!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steven C. Vogel</itunes:summary>     
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>