Residents react to new wind-energy plans

Residents react to new wind-energy plans


Posted by editor Monday, September 21, 2009 - 12:14
Viewed 288 times
20 comments

Debra Williamson stood outside Circle K convenience store on Tehachapi Boulevard. In one hand she held a clipboard with dozens of sign-up sheets. In the other, she held a photo of her sister's property in Old West Ranch, an unincorporated community east of Tehachapi.

“This is what my sister's property looks like now,” Williamson said.

She then folded a transparent sheet with wind generators drawn in black marker over the photo, giving the appearance large turbines rising into the skyline.

“This is what it what it's going to look like if new wind generators are built,” she said.

Williamson said almost 700 people have signed a petition against putting new wind generators in the Tehachapi area.

“It's a wonderful type of power, but it's so close to residential homes,” Williamson said.

The proposed Alta-Oak Creek Mojave Project, which would allow for the construction of up to 300 new wind generators, has drawn reactions from Tehachapi residents - much of it negative, according to Old West Ranch Property Owners Association President Merle Carnes.

“We don't want it,” Carnes said of the project.

Carnes said she didn't know about the project until about a month ago.

“They're being sneaky about this,” Carnes said.

According to representatives from Oak Creek Power and Terra-Gen Power - with the latter currently heading up the project - it has been anything but a secret.

“If people didn't know about this project, then they just weren't paying attention,” said Vaughn Johnson, vice president of Oak Creek Energy.

Johnson said the project had been initially planned as far back as eight years ago. And every step of the way has been public record, he said.

Williamson said people signed her petition “90 percent of the time.” Many who chose not to sign either worked for a company that produces wind energy or was close to someone who did, Williamson said.

If she can't keep the wind generators out, Williamson said, she at least wants ones near Old West Ranch moved five miles to the east of their current proposed location.

“We want to keep Tehachapi the way it is,” Williamson said. “Move to Mojave.”

But Johnson said the Tehachapi-area section of the project could not be moved five miles to the east because many wind generators are already there.

On the issue of alerting the skyline, Terra-Gen power said in a statement, “Visual impacts are not new to the area, since wind generation has been prevalent in the general vicinity for nearly 30 years.”

Some residents have already spoken to the companies about leasing their land for the project, which would be built entirely on private land, according to officials from both Oak Creek and Terra-Gen.

“You can't say 100 percent of the people are against it in Old West Ranch,” Carnes said.

Those who are looking to lease are “keeping to themselves,” Carnes said.

Linda Parker, executive director of Kern Wind Energy, said the project would be built in its proposed location because “it is a designated wind-resource area.”

“They have to go where the wind is,” Parker said.

As far being not knowing about the approaching project, Parker said, “You can't really say that people haven't been aware of the project.”

Parker, who has worked in the wind-power industry since 1995, said the project was far from final, and that public comment would be considered.

“Maybe there is a way we can work together and communicate and hear their concerns, and maybe vice versa,” Parker said. “I know if there's comments put in, they will be addressed.”

A public meeting will be held to discuss the project on Nov. 12 at 7 p.m. in the Kern County Administrative Center on Truxtun Avenue in Bakersfield.

“We're not against wind energy,” Carnes said. “We are willing to sit down and talk with the Alta-Wind folks.”

Parker said wind energy currently brings Kern County $6 million in revenue, with the potential for that number to grow. She said more wind generators would mean more jobs for the Tehachapi-Mojave area.

“Just the jobs alone, it will be phenomenal,” Parker said.

Arthur Unger, member of the Sierra Club's executive committee in Kern County, said the organization tended to favor wind energy, though wind generators had reputations for being “unsightly,” as well as killing bats and birds.

Unger said that no one at the Kern chapter of the Sierra Club had researched the new wind generator project. He said he was “not sure” if anyone at Sierra Club would.

District 2 county Supervisor Don Maben declined comment on the project until after the Nov. 12 meeting.

Comments

In response to Curious:You say people shouldn't feel they are entitled to a view unless they own the property they want to view. Ok, so what if you DO own the property and the county wants to REZONE the property you own which will take away your view (which is on property you own)??? This is the case in Old West Ranch. You say people want clean engery but don't want to pay the price for it. ALL Old West Ranch residents already produce their own electricity. There are NO public utilites. Old West Ranch residents are very familiar with "green-clean energy and what it takes to produce it. Clean energy for Los Angeles is needed. But why should the people of Tehachapi suffer for the sake of the people of Los Angeles????? I feel like the city of Tehachapi and the community of Old West Ranch are being taken advantage of.

Living next to a wind turbine by Phil Bloomstein Location: Freedom, Maine July 1, 2009 http://betterplan.squarespace.com/what-its-like-to-live-near-win/ THESE ARE ACCOUNTS FROM RESIDENTS LIVING NEAR WIND TURBINES.
The sad fact is these wind generators bring little to us local folks. A few temporary jobs and much less long term work. However, our electric bills will increase for sure. If "green energy" was the real issue why wouldn't the focus be directed toward on-site power generation. Instead it is the finance sector aligned with large energy corporations that drive the focus. Basically, we that live in small towns are the red headed buck tooth step children to the big city politicians.

"SILENCE IS CONSENT"

My Sand Canyon home is across the road from the group of windmills located on the north side of the 58 fwy. The winds kicked in for a few weeks recently. The level of noise pollution generated by all of the windmills was aweful. In fact I could hear the windmills, south of the freeway. It sounded like a freeway outdoors, and for 2+ weeks.  The sounds of metal rubbing and mechanical parts was overwhelming at times.

There is another serious issue. In the 5 years we have lived in our natural rural environment we have never seen deer, bears, flocks of birds, wild turkeys or much of anything else. Ravens, sparrows, a few ground squirls, gophers, trantulas, frogs, lizards, coyotes and 1 owl are all that are left. 

My immediate ecosystem is completely trashed. A neighbor recalled there used to be many more birds especially scrub jays. Another neighbor recalls the army of frogs that used to migrate through the canyon annually. I believe birds populations are severely impacted by windmills. Constant noise is stressful and disrupts adequate sleep cycles that animals require, just like people. Tehachapi is a foggy place for multiple months each year. Migrating birds fly at night. They cannot see windmills in the fog any more than we could do so.  They get killed in large numbers.

This leads to the issue at hand in Old West Ranch. I took the drive and spoke with the sister. She gave us a tour of where windmills would go up. This is a vibrant forest with old pines and junipers. It supports habitat with little interference. I saw my first 2 flocks of turkey vultures-ever.  Birds are in threat of extinction globally. 

The 18 land owners have been solicited by wind farm representatives to sell their properties to them or enter into 95 year leases. They want to get easements in order to access areas for construction. The area is also a significant watershed. Google Earth shows this. If successful at chasing the way residents and purchase the properties, they will own water rights to the springs located there, which are numerous. This can deplete the local water supply.

"Meet the Energy Companies"

Oak Creek Power and Terra-Gen Power Oak Creek Energy Alta Oak Creek Mojave Project.

Oak Creek Energy Systems Inc, a Marubeni Company 4-2, Ohtemachi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8088, Japan Tel: [81] (3) 3282-2111 P. O. Box 595, Ginza Branch, Japan Post Service Co., Ltd.TOKYO, 100-8692 JAPAN http://www.oces.com/projects.htmlhttp://www.marubeni.com/sitemap/index.html

Terra-Gen Power

NEW YORK, Aug. 20 /PRNewswire/ -- Terra-Gen Power, LLC, (Terra-Gen), a wholly-owned affiliate of ArcLight Capital Partners (ArcLight)- Boston

ArcLight Capital Partners is a leading energy investment Firm. Formed in 2001 by co-founders Daniel R. Revers and Robb E. Turner, the Firm has demonstrated the ability to invest broadly and profitably across the entire energy industry, while protecting against downside risks. The Firm's superior investment performance is the result of the Firm’s conservative investment approach, deep asset-level knowledge, and market experience.ArcLight has a proven track record of delivering superior returns across the energy industry value chain.

ArcLight manages over $6.8 billion in four funds.http://www.arclightcapital.com/

Who is Kern Wind Energy?

There is a trade association for wind companies. Linda Johnson  http://www.energy.ca.gov/windguidelines/documents/public_comments/Kern_Wind_Energy_Association_2007-08-22.PDF

It's my personal opinion that our yes-men, the Kern Board of Supervisors, have sold our county to investors. Look out. Our county is about to be raped. Anyone living in our community appreciates the serenity of seeing stars at night and have a connectedness to the environment.

Please stand up and don't allow these companies to put these antiquated windmills everywhere. None of us will benefit from this. To the contrary it will bring more people, crime, air pollution, light pollution, noise pollution like in Bakersfield and Los Angeles, the 2 most polluted cities in the whole US.

A final note: Are any of you aware that Ft. Irwin has relocated the endangered desert turtles 2 times to expand their base. They were removed and relocated the first time during hibrination. When they woke up they were eaten by coyotes and ravens. As it prepares to expand training operations at Ft. Irwin in the Mojave Desert, the U.S. Army is again proposing to move more than 1,100 threatened California desert tortoises -- an unprecedented number of an endangered species that has not fared well during previous relocations. Read on at: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2009/08/desert-tortoise-endangered-species-army-training-.html

Job Opportunites

 Temporary at best. There aren't many local experienced wind energy people. It won't benefit our community, unless they're hiring minimum wage entry level personnel for the dirty labor jobs.

Another thing. Companies have no right to shove people aside who have their life savings in their homes. The windmills will render them unsellable. Question: are any developers putting tract homes where windmills are located. If so, where???

I contend no company, poitician, government, investors or individual has the right to do anything they want to do when they own land.  It is treason and a crime against humanity to perform acts that may kill me, make me ill or destroy any more ecosystems for profit that can bring starvation to my doorstep.  This is personal now.  Pollution from chemicals, fossil fuels and man are causing the collapse of our ecosystems.  We're only a small slice of the earth and depend on it's health.  Yet, the thrust to continue urbanizing.  50% of the world is poor and hungry in part from their ansestors' poor stewardship of their lands and food sources.  So what is the US doing?  The best, most fertile farmland- our lifeline that should be protected for it's ability to sustain our nation is being converted to useless ground , covered by cement.  Personally, I have no intention of facing personal starvation.

Those people involved in allowing further collapse of biodiversity on this 1 planet we all share, that continue to spew poisonous chemical and carcinogens into the air, water, land and food sources are criminals.  It's time to treat them for what they are.  It starts with our own community.  Don Maben has recommended his endorsement of a candidate when he retires.  This town needs someone who will represent the best interest of the PEOPLE, not just just economic development.  Our environment (and our health) is at risk and we need to seek out candidates for the replacement position who will not turn a deaf ear to globl warming the changes that must take place to rehabilitate us back to a healthy earth.  Look guys and gals, we either adapt or we take the way of the dinasours.  Take your pick.

Maryjo- I don't know who your getting your info from but per the KCFD website that fire is still under investigation. Also, about this not generating jobs here. There are going to be 300+ more windmills to manage. Do you think they will be maintained by themselves? No. Will they be put up by themselves? No. Yes, many of the workers that will build these turbines will be brought in, but others will be hired, and once they are done they will need people to maintain the turbines. Those jobs will most likely go to people that live here permanently. As far as them bringing in cranes and stuff from out of state?? Terra-Gen will be the one developing this project. They currently operate 13 wind projects, of those 13, 7 are in Ca. They also have 4 office locations, one is in San Diego. With the majority of their projects in Ca don't you think they'd have some of that stuff here? This is stuff I got just from looking a few things up on the internet. You can get a lot of info that way too! :)
I have property in Mountain Meadows, and I for one don't want to look out my front window and see a large windmill not too far from where I live. Not to mention the noise or low hum that they give off. Have you ever seen the oil that runs down each blade imagine that getting thrown around. At the monthly meeting for MM it was said that all the jobs were from people out of state, no jobs here. Plus all equipment being used (crane, ect) were also being brought in from out of state. It was also said that the fires we had near the windmills were started by the windmills. I know that the glider airport is fighting this. I believe because of the flight pattern that is used when the weather is bad.
You are right curious. I was reading a bit too fast, my fault, so sorry ..... So it's a 500 feet obstacle that may be killing somebody some day, still a great hazard and still to close to the Mountain Valley Airport.

"Curious, 500 feet for the tower, generator on top right? - " No Eagle, you are mis-informed. Considering you are the one asking me to do my homework before I comment, have you even read the EIR?

The pdf is available here http://www.co.kern.ca.us/planning/pdfs/eirs/AltaOakCreek/AltaOakCreek_TOC.pdf

Go to section 3.1, page 21 to be precise. You will see they are measured from the top of the foundation to the blade tip (with the blade in the vertical position).

Curious, 500 feet for the tower, generator on top right? - propeller with a diameter of 300 feet (150 per blade) makes in my book 650 feet total. 8000 feet from the runway is very close. At our altitude and on a hot muggy day with limited visibility or at night for that matter everything that sticks that far out of the ground withing less than two miles of an airport runway is a serious concern. You are looking to the size of a sixty story building! and there is more than one side by side. And how about those jobs? How many of them will actually be given to Tehachapi residents, how many will stay in the community? First we need all the illegal immigrants because Americans don't do the work they do and now we need new jobs at any cost? Jobs are good, if they stay in the community and have a future. Those turbines are - once established - mostly automated and controlled by computers. You will have an increase in maintenance, but I doubt that this will bring more than a few jobs onthe long run. I addition I would be interested to see the proclaimed increase in income for the community. As far as I know are these projects heavily subsidized with tax payers money. Why do I have the feeling that that may be the real driver to put up those generators in the first place. Another question would be how expensive this kind of energy truly is and how much of it goes to local communities. Don't get me wrong. I'm in favor of wind energy even if it costs more since it is clean. The problem in this project is the placement of two of the subdivisions. And one more thing from the eyes of a pilot. A bearing of 130 to 150 degree is exactly what local pilots with lower performance aircraft choose to cross the ridges to the desert, since the altitude of the summits is the lowest there and the traffic pattern of Mountain Valley Airport and especially of the base leg runs very close to the closest planned towers (between half a mile and a mile to the end of the runway) and aircraft are supposed to be between 400 and 500 feet above the ground at that time, so add close proximity, an unexperienced or student pilot and the towers together and you have a fine scenario for a disaster.
For those who are interested in this project, read the Environmental Impact Report. Google alta_oak_creek_wind.pdf should find it. Lots of eye opening info here.
Gridless- Three years is enough time to get people back on their feet and ahead of things. This project WOULD generate jobs here. There was an ad for workers for a windmill company in the newspaper awhile ago.These companies pay VERY well. With many just losing their jobs at the cement plant these projects would be an answer to prayer. Many of the guys that work these jobs are single(the moving is very hard on families), for many the daddy is gone months at a time working while his family has a perminent home elsewhere, and some families do move where the work is. So you see, your concerns about an influx of people is inflated to say the least.
For those of you who are in favor of Alta Oak Creek Mojave Project because of the addition of jobs....the majority of the jobs won't last long, maybe three years. In that 3 year span the city of Tehachapi will have to make room for the additional people who will live here for a short time. How long do you wait in line at Albertson's or Save Mart now???? How many students are in your child's classroom. Are there enough vacant properties for these people to rent and not drive up the prices for everyone else who is already renting? Imagine 300 more families also needing groceries, housing, parks, doctors, schools. The power generated will not lower YOUR electricity bills. It's not staying in Kern County even. Would YOU like your next door neighbor's property rezoned so a 500ft wind generator could be built there? The problem as far as Old West Ranch residents are concerned is not the farm itself but the rezoning to put the generators on land in our neighborhood. We bought our properties knowing the existing zoning. Old West Ranch residents already use alternate power sources as there are no electric lines in this neighborhood. So we are not unfamiliar with wind generators. Old West Ranch is not asking for the project to be scrapped only that the generators to be placed on residential properties be moved.
I think I have to side with Jerbo on this one. Tehachapi already has an established windmill forest...anyone that doesn't know or understand that this is one of our industries here already has been in a cave for a while. Yes, views are nice...so are jobs, green energy advancement and a healthier economy in our town. The only thing that concerns me is possibly a safety hazard by one of them by the airport. I think they should look at that closely--safety first. But, that might only (if found truly impacting airport safety) only mean the removal of a couple fo the windmills. As for the rest... let her roll.
Exactly Jerbo! With the economy the way it is right now I think the jobs and energy these windmills would generate is more important than the view of a few. This is coming from a resident of Tehachapi that has lived here for 20+ years and has NEVER wanted to see this town changed. Times change....and with it priorities change to.
Good job, everybody! Now let’s try to get every other industry that obstructs our view out of town! I bet you Cummings Valley folk hate that nasty looking correctional facility, and the folks in town sure hate that ugly old cement plant! I mean, what do we need them for anyways? I mean it’s easy to find a job in Tehachapi, Kmart and Del Taco are always hiring. Heck, even Denny’s from what I’ve heard!
Eagle, I understand you are not talking about existing generators. I have done my homework. The EIR which can be found online clearly states under the project description (section 3.1) "Up to a maximum of 320 wind turbines not to exceed 500 feet in height with associated generators, towers, foundations, and pad mounted transformers". The following pages go into detail on the turbines. Again on 3-23 it reinterates "Depending upon the choice of WTG manufacturer(s) and model(s), tower heights would vary but would not exceed 500 feet." The closest wind turbine is 8200 feet from the east end of the glider port at a bearing of 146 degrees. You can check this on google earth and cross reference the EIR for turbine placement. The military and Kern County have agreed on set structure heights as not to interfere with military training exercises and radar performance. They have created a map known as the red-yellow-green map which can also be found online. This project area falls within the green zone and has a height restriction of 500 feet. Where are you getting your figures?
Excellent comments, Eagle. There is significant glider pilot opposition to this project, stay tuned.
Curious, do your homework first, before you comment. We are not talking about the existing generators. The new 300 generators are planned to go into three subdivisions, one of them will be very close to Mountain Valley Airport and they are larger in size (500 feet for the tower and 150 feet for the blades sticking out over the top) than the ones we have now. You can read this up. It is in fact public record. I'm sure, if you would own land there and you would live there since 30 years you would have a different opinion about "your" view. And YES, this is what companies do. They run "their projects up the flag pole" to see how far they get with it and if there is no resistance then they do whatever they like and whatever makes the most cash. If you would take the time and go and actually look at the project you may be able to understand the people opposing it. And just for the record: I do not live there - so what do I care? - Lets just say I do. I am a local pilot and I know what I am talking about. Do you ?
I will never understand why people feel a sense of entitlement to a view. In all reality, if you enjoy that view so much, perhaps you should go ahead and purchase all of that land. Then you could enjoy your view forever. So many people want to have clean energy but when it comes down to it, they only want it if it does not have any direct impact on them. Eagle, where are you getting your information from? Zoning, FAA & Military laws clearly state no heights over 500 feet. The closest turbines to the glider port are east of Willow Springs Road and have been approved by the FAA & Military. Any glider flying that low, that far away from the airport will never make it to the airport. The firefighters and helicoptors have never had any issues with the clearly visible turbines. Do you actually believe the FAA & Military would approve anything that is as you say 'a hazard to aviation' ?
at least one of the project locations is very close to the eastern approach and departure end of the Mountain Valley Airport. The planned 600+ feet towers are stating a hazard to aviation. Parts of the planned devlopment will be in the way of fire helicopters to their water reservoirs to fight wild fires in that area. There is much more at stake than landowners being upset of having those monsters practically in their backyard. What a joke "We have to go where the wind is!" They want to go where it is convenient and easy to build them, which is in an area that has a developped infrastructure. There are plenty of places on the ridges to the north where the wind blows just as strong, but where the turbines wouldn't be right in the way of aircraft transitioning from the central valley into the desert.